MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163182781 · doi:10.1080/07055900.2012.747951

Northwest Atlantic Surface Circulation from Multi-Satellite Observations

2012· article· en· W2163182781 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Kyoko Ohashi, Guoqi Han, Nancy F. Chen, Jim Helbig

Bibliographic record

VenueATMOSPHERE-OCEAN · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
FundersCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsDrifterBuoyOcean currentGeologyScatterometerSea-surface heightOcean surface topographyAcoustic Doppler current profilerGeostrophic windCurrent (fluid)SatelliteClimatologyStokes driftCirculation (fluid dynamics)GeodesySea surface temperatureSurface waveOceanographyWind speedMechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The advent of satellite remote sensing has led to new ways of monitoring and studying the near-surface ocean circulation, but its use has often been limited to the deep ocean. Here we present and validate a method of reconstructing the near-surface currents from multi-sensor satellite data off Atlantic Canada with a resolution of 0.25°, for the period from October 1992 to September 2006. The reconstructed ocean circulation consists of a superposition of 1) depth-variable wind-induced Ekman currents and surface wave-induced Stokes drift calculated from scatterometer-measured wind velocities using a theoretical formulation; 2) depth-invariant geostrophic surface current anomalies calculated from altimetric sea surface height anomalies; and 3) mean currents that are a combination of model-simulated currents for the Newfoundland and southern Labrador Shelves and satellite-observed currents for the rest of the study region. The method features two novel aspects: the integration of simulated and satellite-observed mean circulation fields, and the consideration of the surface wave-induced Stokes drift. Individual weekly-mean composite current fields show considerable temporal variation and spatial structure. Inclusion of the numerically simulated mean circulation field leads to better agreement between the composite currents and buoy-observed currents at 15 m depth, compared to using the satellite-derived mean current field alone. There is also fair agreement between the composite currents and instantaneous currents observed at various depths by shipboard acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) data, with a correlation coefficient of 0.59 (a 95% confidence interval of 0.49–0.68) and a vector difference ratio of 0.61. The 15 m depth composite currents agree better with buoy-observed currents than a similar near-surface current product with coarser horizontal resolution. At the sea surface, composite currents calculated with Stokes drift have a mean speed of 0.35 m s−1, similar to currents observed by drifters (0.36 m s−1), but exclusion of the Stokes drift leads to an underestimation of the current speed. The present study demonstrates that an appropriate integration of multi-sensor satellite data can provide approximate near-surface current information and could be used for routine monitoring of the shelf circulation at synoptic scales, complementing in situ observations and numerical ocean modelling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2012
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueATMOSPHERE-OCEANSame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207