MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163207898 · doi:10.1002/pros.20046

Up‐regulation of cathepsin X in prostate cancer and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia

2004· article· en· W2163207898 on OpenAlexaff
Dorit K. Nägler, Sabine Krüger, Angela Kellner, Edmund Ziomek, Robert Ménard, Peter Buhtz, Matthias Krams, Albert Roessner, Udo Kellner

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Prostate · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsBiotechnology Research Institute
FundersLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München
KeywordsProstate cancerProstateBiologyPathologyCathepsinCathepsin LImmunohistochemistryIntraepithelial neoplasiaProstatectomyCarcinogenesisIn situ hybridizationPCA3Cathepsin BCancerMolecular biologyCancer researchMedicineMessenger RNAGeneEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Evidence is accumulating that several proteases are involved in prostate cancer progression. A locus which is often amplified in prostate cancer is the chromosomal region 20q13. Interestingly, one of the genes encoding the cysteine protease cathepsin X maps to this region. The aim of this study was to assess the expression pattern of cathepsin X in malignant and non-malignant prostatic tissue samples. METHODS: Matched malignant and non-malignant tissue specimens were obtained from 56 men after radical prostatectomy. Cathepsin X was quantified at both protein and mRNA levels using several detection methods: Western blotting, immunohistochemistry, quantitative RT-PCR, and in situ hybridization. Furthermore, genomic DNA was analyzed by PCR for possible gene amplification. RESULTS: Immunohistochemical analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of radical prostatectomy specimens was performed utilizing a polyclonal antibody against human procathepsin X and revealed staining of acinar basal cells in normal prostate glands. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasias (PINs) and prostate carcinomas stained highly positive for cathepsin X, showing a significant difference to the staining of normal prostate glands. In contrast, relatively weak and heterogeneous staining was observed for cathepsins F, B, and L. Up-regulation of cathepsin X at the protein level was confirmed by Western blotting. No statistically significant difference was observed at the mRNA level. PCR of genomic DNA revealed that cathepsin X up-regulation most likely occurs in the absence of genomic amplification. CONCLUSIONS: The high expression levels of cathepsin X both in PIN and invasive adenocarcinomas of the prostate suggest that cathepsin X may play a role in the early tumorigenesis of prostate cancer. Further studies are needed to define the utility of this cysteine protease as a diagnostic marker for the early detection of prostate cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations85
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe ProstateSame topicProtease and Inhibitor MechanismsFrench-language works237,207