Du territoire identitaire aux nouveaux partenariats ville-campagne : les voies du développement local dans la haute vallée de la Loire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans des campagnes fragiles comme celles de la haute vallée montagnarde de la Loire, les initiatives de développement sont renouvelées. Élus et associations tentent désormais de «mettre en patrimoine» cet espace «saturé de territoires» (intercommunalités complexes, deux départements, deux régions, un parc naturel régional calqué sur les limites départementales…) et situé entre deux pôles d’excursion de renommée nationale, voire internationale (Le Puy-en-Velay, Gerbier-de-Jonc – source de la Loire). La question de l’échelle géographique est fondamentale puisque l’on tente de développer un partenariat original autour d’espaces de référence qui s’emboîtent: haute vallée, massif du Mézenc, bassin-versant de la Loire, régions européennes sources de grands fleuves. Outre les nouvelles perceptions de l’Environnement que cette initiative révèle, on souhaite également valoriser les relations entre l’amont et l’aval jusqu’à la métropole nantaise, inaugurant de nouveaux rapports à la ville et aux cités de l’Ouest français.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".