MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163281355 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.1994.518988

A novel time-domain approach for the design of quadrature mirror filter banks

2002· article· en· W2163281355 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Filter Design and Implementation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputationQuadrature mirror filterQuadratic equationIterative methodFrequency domainQuadrature (astronomy)AlgorithmComputer scienceTime domainDomain (mathematical analysis)Filter (signal processing)Function (biology)MathematicsMathematical optimizationFilter designPrototype filterMathematical analysisElectronic engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel approach for the design of two-channel QMF banks is proposed. In the design, instead of minimizing the objective function directly, an iterative procedure is used in each step in which the objective function is modified into a quadratic function whose minimum point can be obtained analytically. Compared with the iterative method proposed recently by Chen and Lee (1992) in which the perfect reconstruction condition is formulated in the frequency domain, the perfect reconstruction condition in our method is formulated in the time domain. This avoids calculating large matrices and leads to reduced computation complexity in the design. A case study is included which demonstrates that the proposed method needs only a fraction of the computation time required by the method of Chen and Lee.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital Filter Design and ImplementationFrench-language works237,207