MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163291063 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2007.070065

Performance Analysis of Decode-and-Forward Relaying with Selection Combining

2007· article· en· W2163291063 on OpenAlexaff
Jeremiah Hu, Norman C. Beaulieu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSelection (genetic algorithm)RelayOutage probabilityDiversity combiningMaximal-ratio combiningSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Expression (computer science)Antenna diversityCooperative diversityPerformance improvementAlgorithmTelecommunicationsDecoding methodsFadingWirelessArtificial intelligencePower (physics)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed spatial diversity systems utilize multiple communication nodes to create independent signal replicas that are combined at the destination. Practical diversity receivers often employ simple combining techniques especially if comparable performance to more complex optimum combining can be achieved. The performance of decode-and-forward relaying that uses selection combining is investigated. In particular, a closed- form expression for the outage probability of a system with an arbitrary number of relay nodes is derived. By comparing the performance of a system that uses selection combining to one that uses optimum maximal ratio combining, it is shown that the performance loss due to using a less complex combiner is not substantial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations121
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207