Propagande d’hygiène mentale au Québec dans les années 1930
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’hygiène mentale est un dispositif qui sert à gérer les populations. Pour y parvenir, on doit mener des enquêtes sur tous les sujets, particulièrement chez les jeunes élèves. C’est là le point d’origine de la discipline qui sépare, traite et, dans la mesure du possible, répare le sujet « défectueux ». Parallèlement, il faut convaincre la nation du bien-fondé de cette discipline et de son oeuvre sociale, scientifique et morale. En 1931 et 1932, on assiste à la première campagne médiatique d’hygiène mentale sur les ondes de CKAC. Ce corpus donne un aperçu de la détermination des hygiénistes mentaux dans leurs menées sociales et sanitaires pour que la société progresse à l’abri du mal et de la dangerosité qui s’incarne dans la folie. Ce détour par le passé ouvre la porte à l’analyse du temps présent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".