MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163402984 · doi:10.2138/rmg.2002.48.2

Compositions of the Apatite-Group Minerals: Substitution Mechanisms and Controlling Factors

2002· article· en· W2163402984 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Yuanming Pan, Michael E. Fleet

Bibliographic record

VenueReviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadioactive element chemistry and processing
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCitationApatiteLibrary scienceArchaeologyGeologyGeographyGeochemistryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| January 01, 2002 Compositions of the Apatite-Group Minerals: Substitution Mechanisms and Controlling Factors Yuanming Pan; Yuanming Pan Department of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5E2, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Michael E. Fleet Michael E. Fleet Department of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Yuanming Pan Department of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5E2, Canada Michael E. Fleet Department of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada Publisher: Mineralogical Society of America First Online: 03 Mar 2017 © The Mineralogical Society Of America Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry (2002) 48 (1): 13–49. https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2002.48.2 Article history First Online: 03 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation Yuanming Pan, Michael E. Fleet; Compositions of the Apatite-Group Minerals: Substitution Mechanisms and Controlling Factors. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry 2002;; 48 (1): 13–49. doi: https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2002.48.2 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyReviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Search Advanced Search The apatite-group minerals of the general formula, M10(ZO4)6X2 (M = Ca, Sr, Pb, Na…, Z = P, As, Si, V…, and X = F, OH, Cl…), are remarkably tolerant to structural distortion and chemical substitution, and consequently are extremely diverse in composition (e.g., Kreidler and Hummel 1970; McConnell 1973; Roy et al. 1978; Elliott 1994). Of particular interest is that a number of important geological, environmental/paleoenvironmental, and technological applications of the apatite-group minerals are directly linked to their chemical compositions. It is therefore fundamentally important to understand the substitution... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations801
Published2002
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistrySame topicRadioactive element chemistry and processingFrench-language works237,207