MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163410978 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.71.025802

Multichannel<i>R</i>-matrix analysis of elastic and inelastic resonances in the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math><i>p</i>compound system

2005· article· lv· W2163410978 on OpenAlexafffund
C. Ruiz, T. Davinson, F. Sarazin, I. Roberts, A. Robinson, P. J. Woods, L. Buchmann, A.C. Shotter, P. Walden, Nicholas Clarke, A. A. Chen, Benjamin J. Fulton, D. Groombridge, J. Pearson, A. St. J. Murphy

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review C · 2005
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityTRIUMF
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilTRIUMF
KeywordsPhysicsParity (physics)Inelastic scatteringR-matrixAtomic physicsResonance (particle physics)Formalism (music)Nuclear reactionNucleusScatteringElastic scatteringNuclear physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A multichannel R-matrix formalism was used to fit $^{21}\mathrm{Na}+$ p resonant elastic and inelastic scattering data taken at the TRIUMF UK detector array facility at TRIUMF-ISAC. Five resonances were observed corresponding to states in $^{22}\mathrm{Mg}$ above the proton threshold. Four of these corresponded to states seen in previous transfer reaction studies where firm spin-parity assignments could not be made. One new resonance, previously unobserved in any reaction, was also seen. Where possible, resonance energies, partial widths, and spin-parity values of these resonances were extracted. The correspondence between these states and possible analogs in the mirror nucleus $^{22}\mathrm{Ne}$ is discussed, as well as the relation to $T=1$ states in the nucleus $^{22}\mathrm{Na}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207