Jeux d'échelle et transformation de l'État : le gouvernement des territoires en France et au Québec.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jeux d'échelle et transformation de l'État : le gouvernement des territoires en France et au Québec., Laurence Bherer, Jean-Pierre Collin, Éric Kerrouche et Jacques Palard (sous la direction de)., Québec : Les Presses de l'Université Laval, Québec, 2005, 527 p. Les réformes territoriales initiées par Louise Harel au Québec et Jean-Pierre Chevènement en France sont au cœur du propos de cet ouvrage. Ces transformations ont eu lieu simultanément il y a environ cinq ans et attestent des préoccupations de réorganisation de la gouvernance territoriale dans ces deux États. L'ouvrage contribue à faire progresser la réflexion sur les formes émergentes de l'action publique territoriale en relativisant la portée de ce mouvement par l'analyse comparative. Approximativement cinq ans après que le Québec et la France eurent entrepris des réformes importantes de gestion territoriale, le besoin de faire le point et de dresser un premier bilan s'imposait. Cet ouvrage y participe directement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".