MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163443873 · doi:10.1109/pes.2003.1270985

Port Albert wind farms Ltd. single Vestas V47-660 kW wind turbine installation

2004· article· en· W2163443873 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patricio Andres

Bibliographic record

Venue2003 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37491) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMarine and Offshore Engineering Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWind powerPort (circuit theory)ShoreDeregulationTurbineElectricity marketElectricityMarine engineeringEnvironmental scienceBusinessEngineeringTelecommunicationsMeteorologyElectrical engineeringEconomicsGeographyGeologyMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with the deregulation of the Ontario electricity market, in the spring of 2001 David Thompson (my partner) and myself decided to take the first step to make our dream become a reality to install a wind farm along the Lake Huron Shoreline. We decided to install a single Vestas V47-660 kW wind turbine near the village of port Albert within about 4 km of the Lake Huron Shoreline. I have taken wind measurements in the area as far back as 1992 and we were confident that the area had an economically viable wind resource which with the right incentives could be developed. The power was initially sold to Ontario power generation (OPG) into the interim market until the wholesale electricity market opened in May of 2002. Since that time the power has been sold at spot market rates to hydro one but without selling the associated environmental attributes to the utility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.343
Threshold uncertainty score0.681

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2003 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37491)Same topicMarine and Offshore Engineering StudiesFrench-language works237,207