MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163448495 · doi:10.1139/w05-123

Biochemical and taxonomic characterization of bacteria associated with the crucifer root maggot (<i>Delia radicum</i>)

2006· article· en· W2163448495 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Angelina T Lukwinski, Janet E. Hill, Sean M. Hemmingsen, Dwayne D. Hegedus

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNational Research Council CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCruciferBiologyMaggotAnthomyiidaeBotanyBacteriaPEST analysisGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The crucifer root maggot, Delia radicum, is an important pest of cruciferous crops; however, little is known about its digestive biochemistry or resident gut microbiota. A culturing approach was used to survey the types of micro organisms associated with eggs, midgut, and faeces of larvae feeding on rutabaga. All bacteria isolated from the midgut and faecal materials were Gram-negative bacilli. Nine types of culturable bacteria were identified within the midgut based on analysis of 60 kDa chaperonin sequences and were generally gamma-Proteobacteria, primarily Enterobacteriaceae. Carbohydrate utilization patterns, select biochemical pathways, and hydrolytic enzymes were examined using the API(R) system for each of the nine groups, revealing an exceptionally broad metabolic and hydrolytic potential. These studies suggest that resident alimentary tract microorganisms have the potential to contribute to host nutrition directly as a food source as well as by providing increased digestive potential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.982

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.150
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2006
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MicrobiologySame topicCocoa and Sweet Potato AgronomyFrench-language works237,207