MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163478475 · doi:10.1109/tap.2006.875924

A Method for Reflectarray Antenna Design Assisted by Near Field Measurements

2006· article· en· W2163478475 on OpenAlexaff
Jean-David Lacasse, Jean‐Jacques Laurin

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntenna (radio)PlanarTransmission lineField (mathematics)Near and far fieldOpticsPlanar arrayAcousticsComputer sciencePhysicsElectronic engineeringMathematicsTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel approach is proposed for reflectarray antenna design which makes use of planar near field measurements to characterize the scatterers and the incident field on the structure. This method is based on an equivalent transmission line model of a unit cell in an infinite periodic array. A monopole probe is used to sense a scattered signal in the near field of a reflectarray illuminated by a primary source. These measurements are introduced in the model and provide all the necessary data to accomplish the design. The method has been validated experimentally with four prototypes based on different levels of approximation, at a central frequency of 15 GHz. The results indicate that the proposed near-field based technique allows the design of reflectarrays having similar or better performance than those obtained when numerical modeling is used to obtain the phase response of the unit cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207