MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163509294 · doi:10.1109/nano.2008.107

Investigation of Strain Effects on the Band-Structure of Si Nanowires using TB and DFT Methods

2008· article· en· W2163509294 on OpenAlexaff
Daryoush Shiri, Yifan Kong, Andrei Buin, M. P. Anantram

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanowire Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Institute of Standards and Technology
KeywordsStrain (injury)NanowireBand gapMaterials scienceSiliconDensity functional theorySilicon nanowiresStrain engineeringCondensed matter physicsNanotechnologyCrystallographyOptoelectronicsComputational chemistryPhysicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using density functional theory and semi-empirical sp3d5s* tight binding calculations, we find that a 1% axial strain can change the bandgap of Hydrogenated Silicon nanowires by up to 100 meV. Further, compressive strain causes a direct-to-indirect bandgap transition. As the nanowire diameter increases, this transition occurs at smaller compressive strains, which makes it easier to experimentally observe. We also find that the rate of change of bandgap with strain is relatively independent of diameter for small diameter nanowires and only the geometry of the bonds (growth direction) determines its value. These robust effects also manifest as a large effective-mass change with strain, which could prove useful in SiNW-based sensors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNanowire Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207