Tracking basement cross-strike discontinuities in the Indian crust beneath the Himalayan orogen using gravity data – relationship to upper crustal faults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Himalaya is the result of the on-going convergence and collision of India and Asia. The internal configuration and processes that govern the rise of the Himalayan Mountains and Tibetan Plateau are crucial to understand continental collision zones. However, knowledge of the prior configuration of the colliding plates is equally important, since inherited (pre-orogenic/basement) structures can undeniably influence the development of the orogenic architecture throughout the orogen's cycle of collision and eventual collapse. Three northeast-trending palaeotopographic ridges of faulted Precambrian Indian basement underlie the Ganga basin south of the Himalaya. Our paper illustrates a crustal-scale fault origin for these ridges and succeeds in determining how far north beneath the Himalayan system they extend and how they ultimately govern the location of upper crustal faults in southern Tibet. Spectrally filtered EGM2008 Bouguer gravity data and edges in its horizontal gradient at different source depths (‘gravity worms’) over northern Peninsular India, the Himalaya and southern Tibet reveal several continuous Himalayan cross-strike discontinuities interpreted to represent crustal faults. Gravity lineaments in Peninsular India coincide with edges of the Precambrian basement ridges and megakinks up to 100 km wide develop in foreland cover sequences between the interpreted basement faults. The interpreted basement faults project northward beneath the Himalayan system and southern Tibet. Our results suggest that several active Himalayan cross-strike faults, such as the ones related to many graben in southern Tibet, are rooted in the underplated Indian lower crust or step en échelon along interpreted basement faults. Our interpretation thus suggests that south Tibet graben are spatially related to deep-seated crustal-scale faults rooted in the underplated Indian crust. These major discontinuities partition the Himalayan range into distinct zones, and could ultimately contribute to lateral variability in tectonic evolution along the orogen's strike.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".