MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163584681 · doi:10.1002/rnc.3100

Constraint adaptive output regulation of output feedback systems with application to electrostatic torsional micromirror

2013· article· en· W2163584681 on OpenAlexaff
Weijie Sun, Jianglin Lan, John T. W. Yeow

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Constraint (computer-aided design)Nonlinear systemRegulatorConvergence (economics)Lyapunov functionAdaptive controlFunction (biology)Computer scienceMathematicsControl (management)PhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary This paper studies a constraint adaptive output regulation design for a class of nonlinear systems with an unknown exosystem by output feedback control. First, by introducing an internal model with some known design parameter, our concerned problem may be formulated as a specific regulation problem with output constraint. Then, the barrier Lyapunov function technique is further integrated to approach the problem. It is shown that such a constraint adaptive output regulation problem is solvable without constraint violation. In particular, the constructed regulator cannot only keep the boundedness of the closed‐loop system signals but also guarantees the parameter convergence for the unknown parameter vector in the exosystem. As an application, it is illustrated that our result is applicable in tracking the control of an electrostatic torsional micromirror with physical geometry constraint. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Robust and Nonlinear ControlSame topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207