Selective isolation and distribution of<i>Actinobispora</i>strains in soil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A simplified enrichment method for selective isolation of Actinobispora strains from soil is described. Actinobispora spores were tolerant to dry-heat treatment at 110 degrees C for 15 min. Actinobispora was more resistant to 1 microgram/mL leucomycin, 1 microgram/mL novobiocin, and 0.5 microgram/mL tunicamycin than Streptomyces dominant in soil, which prevents selective isolation of Actinobispora. Percentages of Actinobispora colonies on the isolation plate were increased by addition of antibiotics and dry-heat treatment of the soil samples. By combining the techniques described above, this genus was isolated from 105 out of 574 soil samples (18% of the samples tested). It was recovered from the soil samples with pH values ranging 5.0 to 8.9, and 78% of strains were isolated from neutral soil (pH 6.0-8.0). A number of Actinobispora strains were isolated from various soils around the world. Actinobispora strains are widely distributed in the world at relatively high frequency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".