MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163650454 · doi:10.1093/humupd/dms013

Testosterone concentrations, using different assays, in different types of ovarian insufficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2012· review· en· W2163650454 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Reproduction Update · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal and reproductive studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeta-analysisTestosterone (patch)MedicinePremature ovarian insufficiencyInternal medicineEndocrinologyPhysiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Increasing age and post-menopausal status are associated with decreasing androgen concentrations in females. Women with premature loss of ovarian function, such as primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) or iatrogenic menopause may be at increased risk for diminished testosterone levels at a relatively young age. Differentiation between a hypoandrogenic or normoandrogenic state in women with premature loss of ovarian function is problematic due to trueness and precision problems using various testosterone assays. The current meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate current literature reporting serum total testosterone concentrations under these conditions, including stratification for various testosterone assays. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled observational studies were performed. The electronic databases of Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched until October 2011 for comparative studies on total testosterone concentrations in women with spontaneous POI or iatrogenic menopause compared with controls. The literature search, data extraction and critical appraisal, using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, were performed by two independent investigators. The effect measure was the weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) in a random effects model. RESULTS: A total of 206 articles for spontaneous POI and 1358 for iatrogenic menopause were reviewed, of which 9 and 17 papers, respectively, were selected for final analysis. Both groups demonstrated significantly lower total testosterone concentrations compared with controls [WMD (95% CI) -0.38 (-0.55 to -0.22) nmol/l, and -0.29 (-0.39 to -0.18) nmol/l, respectively], but with substantial between-study heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis for assay type was statistically significant for spontaneous POI only. Sensitivity analyses of high-quality studies did not change the results, and resulted in a substantial decrease in heterogeneity in spontaneous POI studies. CONCLUSIONS: The current meta-analysis demonstrates that total testosterone concentrations are decreased in women with spontaneous POI or iatrogenic menopause. The potential implications of hypoandrogenism in these women remain to be elucidated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.888
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.187
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it