MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163664463

KRESS, Gunther et VAN LEEUWEN, Theo (1996). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. Londres: Routledge. 288 p.

2008· article· en· W2163664463 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommposite · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicVisual Culture and Art Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesOmnipresenceArtReading (process)PhilosophyLinguisticsTheology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Il est devenu banal de signaler l'omnipresence de l'image dans le monde contemporain. Souvent jugee tapageuse, ou pire, pernicieuse, l'image s'impose volontiers au regard mais demeure neanmoins obscure au niveau de son fonctionnement, ou encore de ses significations profondes : il semble que si l'image s'offre a tous, elle ne se devoile pleinement qu'a un regard averti, celui de l'esthete par exemple. Pourtant, l'omnipresence meme de l'image exhorte a une meilleure connaissance de son role social et de ses mecanismes enonciatifs, hors du champ specialise des arts visuels et dans la sphete elargie de la sociologie et de la communication. C'est a pareil travail d'education des regards que se livrent Gunther Kress et Theo van Leeuwen dans leur ambitieux ouvrage Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it