MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Evidence for late Mesoproterozoic tectonism in northern Yukon and the identification of a Grenville‐age tectonothermal belt in western Laurentia

2011· article· en· W2163671514 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Dejan Milidragovic, Derek J. Thorkelson, W J Davis, Daniel D. Marshall, H. Daniel Gibson

Bibliographic record

VenueTerra Nova · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of CanadaSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLaurentiaRodiniaGeologySupercontinentMetamorphismProterozoicBalticaZirconPaleontologyPrecambrianOrogenyEarth scienceLarge igneous provinceGeochemistryMagmatismTectonicsOrdovicianCraton

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Terra Nova, 23, 307–313, 2011 Abstract New U‐Pb zircon dates from gneissic xenoliths in an Early Cambrian lamprophyre point to late Mesoproterozoic metamorphism and magmatism in the crust beneath northern Yukon. The data indicate a previously unrecognized thermal event in Yukon and extend the recognition of widely spaced 1.3–1.0 Ga igneous, metamorphic and tectonic events along the western margin of Laurentia. Together, these events demonstrate that the north‐western margin of Laurentia was thermally active during a period of traditionally inferred tectonic quiescence. The tectonic setting, intensity and general nature of this late Mesoproterozoic tectonothermal activity are poorly constrained, but their recognition is key to expanding our understanding of the Proterozoic geology of North America. The recognition of this event places new constraints on the palaeotectonic reconstructions of the supercontinent Rodinia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.679
Threshold uncertainty score0.638

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTerra NovaSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207