Design of a web-based remote heart-monitoring system
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rising costs and cutbacks to healthcare systems are making it less feasible to transport cardiac specialists and equipment from metropolitan cities to remote communities to perform electrocardiogram (ECG) heart examinations. Although telemedicine networking allows specialists to perform remote ECG examinations over dedicated T1 network connections, it is a capital-intensive solution. This paper proposes a much more cost-effective system whereby ECG signals are transmitted over the Internet. A prototype system was designed and assembled, consisting of a portable instrumentation amplifier/filter unit, two personal computers equipped with network and analog to digital cards, and TCP/IP client-server data acquisition (DAQ) software written in LabVIEW. Although Internet-based remote ECG monitoring systems have been attempted in the past, satellite links imposed unpractical limitations on the system. However, by reducing the ECG data transmission rate and packet size to allow for faster satellite transmission times, it is demonstrated that a web-based remote ECG monitoring system is a practical alternative to the current methods used in specialized cardiac regional healthcare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it