The Distinctive Features of a Picture of the World of the Students of Pharmaceutical Faculty
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The relevance of the studied problem is caused by the lack of the uniform model of a picture of the world of the professional and the insufficient number of the researches of a picture of the world of the pharmacists. The purpose of this article is the acquaintance of the psychologists working in the educational institutions and the pharmaceutical companies with the results of the research of a picture of the world of the students of the pharmaceutical faculty of medical school, which work in the specialty. The main result of this research is the empirical confirmation of the model of the picture of the world that includes the belief about the goodwill and justice of the world around, the one’s own value and importance, the luck and ability to control the events of the life, about the future and about the efficiency of the professional activity. The materials of the article can be useful for the psychologists of the educational institutions in which there are pharmaceutical faculties, and also for the psychologists working in the pharmaceutical companies and pharmacy chains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it