MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Discontinuous Galerkin frequency domain forward modelling for the inversion of electric permittivity in the 2D case

2011· article· en· W2163727927 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Prospecting · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsDiscretizationDiscontinuous Galerkin methodGalerkin methodInterpolation (computer graphics)Finite element methodInversion (geology)Inverse problemSpectral element methodMaxwell's equationsFrequency domainPermittivityComputer scienceMathematical analysisMathematicsAlgorithmApplied mathematicsPhysicsGeologyExtended finite element methodDielectric

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We have recently developed a discontinuous Galerkin frequency domain modelling algorithm for the solution of the 2D transverse magnetic Maxwell equations. This method is formulated on an unstructured triangular discretization of the computational domain and makes use of a high order polynomial interpolation of the electromagnetic field components within each triangular element. The discontinuous nature of the approximation naturally allows for a local definition of the interpolation order that is, in combination with a possibly non‐conforming local refinement of the mesh, a key ingredient for obtaining a flexible and accurate discretization method. Moreover, heterogeneity of the propagation media is easily dealt with by assuming element‐wise values of the electromagnetic parameters. In this paper, we propose the use of this discontinuous Galerkin frequency domain method as the forward modelling algorithm for solving the inverse problem for the electric permittivity in the 2D case. The inversion process is based on a gradient minimization technique developed by Pratt for seismological applications. Preliminary numerical results are presented for the imaging of a simplified subsurface model with the aim of assessing the performances of the proposed inversion methodology with regards to the number of frequencies, the number of recorded data and the number of sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.720
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it