Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis la fin des années 1990, les recueils de Nicole Brossard allient un discours lyrique valorisant le lien amoureux à une forme d’humanisme mettant en examen les problèmes environnementaux et politiques qui assaillent la planète. Nous nous intéresserons particulièrement aux modalités de ce lyrisme critique, dans ses plus récents recueils, en montrant comment cette écriture puise dans certaines tonalités mélancoliques toutes contemporaines qui ne font jamais l’économie de la résistance critique. En réinterrogeant les modes d’habitation du monde, au tournant du xxie siècle, la poésie réaffirme en effet sa portée éthique. Par ailleurs, on abordera les particularités de cette écriture fondée sur le désir de circulation infinie entre les contradictions, entre les lieux, entre les places énonciatives. Cela nous permettra d’explorer les nouveaux aspects de cette poétique puisant sa dynamique dans les formes du ruissellement alors que le rythme qui la caractérise s’apparente à un « piano-prose ».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".