MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163744852 · doi:10.1002/sdtp.10446

35.1: <i>Distinguished Paper</i> : Auto‐Calibration for Screen Correction and Point Cloud Generation

2015· article· en· W2163744852 on OpenAlexafffund
Jason Deglint, Andrew Cameron, Christian Scharfenberger, Mark Lamm, Alexander Wong, David A. Clausi

Bibliographic record

VenueSID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topic3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsChristie (Canada)University of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsOntario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation
KeywordsProjectorCalibrationComputer sciencePoint cloudStructured lightComputer visionComputer graphics (images)Projection (relational algebra)Artificial intelligenceCamera resectioningCheckerboardBundle adjustmentPoint (geometry)AlgorithmMathematicsImage (mathematics)Geometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Showing a checkerboard at different poses for camera projector calibration is impractical for large scale applications such as projection mapping onto buildings. We use an automatic calibration technique that projects Gray code structured light patterns, which, extracted by the camera, build a dense correspondence for calibration. Two applications benefit from automatic calibration: 3D model generation and screen correction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0950.058

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSID Symposium Digest of Technical PapersSame topic3D Surveying and Cultural HeritageFrench-language works237,207