MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163748614 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2007.907291

Constrained Detection for Spatial-Multiplexing Multiple-Input–Multiple-Output Systems

2008· article· en· W2163748614 on OpenAlexafffund
Tao Cui, Chintha Tellambura, Yue Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMIMODetectorDetection theoryComputer scienceAlgorithmInterference (communication)Spatial multiplexingMultiplexingElectronic engineeringControl theory (sociology)SIGNAL (programming language)EngineeringTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A family of detectors that exploit signal constraints is developed for maximum-likelihood detection for multiple-input–multiple-output (MIMO) systems. Real constrained detectors and decision-feedback detectors are proposed for real constellations by forcing the relaxed solution to be real. A generalized minimum mean square error (GMMSE) and constrained least squares MIMO detectors are also developed for unitary and nonunitary signal constellations. Using these constrained detectors, we propose a new ordering scheme to achieve a tradeoff between interference suppression and noise enhancement. Moreover, to mitigate the inherent error propagation, the decision-feedback MIMO detectors are integrated with signal constraints. The simulation results show that our combined detector achieves a significant performance gain over vertical Bell Laboratories layered space-time (V-BLAST) detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207