MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163749338 · doi:10.1109/icac.2007.3

Adaptive Learning of Metric Correlations for Temperature-Aware Database Provisioning

2007· article· en· W2163749338 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Database Systems and Queries
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDatabaseBottleneckProvisioningDatabase tuningDistributed computingData miningViewDatabase designComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces a transparent self-configuring architecture for automatic scaling with temperature awareness in the database tier of a dynamic content Web server. We use a unified approach to achieving the joint objectives of performance, efficient resource usage and avoiding temperature hot-spots in a replicated database cluster. The key novelty in our approach is a lightweight on-line learning method for fast adaptations to bottleneck situations. Our approach is based on deriving a lightweight performance model of the replicated database cluster on the fly. The system trains its own model based on perceived correlations between various system and application metrics and the query latency for the application. The model adjusts itself dynamically to changes in the application workload mix. We use our performance model for query latency pre diction and determining the number of database replicas necessary to meet the incoming load. We adapt by adding the necessary replicas, pro-actively in anticipation of a bottleneck situation and we remove them automatically in underload. Finally, the system adjusts its query scheduling algorithm dynamically in order to avoid temperature hot- spots within the replicated database cluster. We investigate our transparent database provisioning mechanism in the database tier using the TPC-W industry- standard e-commerce benchmark. We demonstrate that our technique provides quality of service in terms of both performance and avoiding hot-spot machines under different load scenarios. We further show that our method is robust to dynamic changes in the workload mix of the application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score0.312

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Database Systems and QueriesFrench-language works237,207