MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163754616 · doi:10.1002/btpr.647

Development of a mathematical model for evaluating the dynamics of normal and apoptotic Chinese hamster ovary cells

2011· article· en· W2163754616 on OpenAlexaff
Saeideh Naderi, Mukesh Meshram, Catherine Wei, Brendan J. McConkey, Brian Ingalls, Hector Budman, Jeno M. Scharer

Bibliographic record

VenueBiotechnology Progress · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinese hamster ovary cellDynamics (music)ApoptosisOvaryHamsterCell biologyBiologyComputational biologyMolecular biologyGeneticsCell culturePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A metabolic flux based methodology was developed for modeling the metabolism of a Chinese hamster ovary cell line. The elimination of insignificant fluxes resulted in a simplified metabolic network which was the basis for modeling the significant metabolites. Employing kinetic rate expressions for growing and non-growing subpopulations, a logistic model was developed for cell growth and dynamic models were formulated to describe culture composition and monoclonal antibody (MAb) secretion. The model was validated for a range of nutrient concentrations. Good agreement was obtained between model predictions and experimental data. The ultimate goal of this study is to establish a comprehensive dynamic model which may be used for model-based optimization of the cell culture for MAb production in both batch and fed-batch systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiotechnology ProgressSame topicViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsFrench-language works237,207