Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the fetal period, blood is oxygenated through the placenta, and most of the cardiac output bypasses the lung through the ductus arteriosus. At birth, pulmonary vascular resistance falls with the initiation of ventilation. Coincidentally, the ductus arteriosus constricts. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) appears to play an important role during that transition period and postnatally. ET-1 can dramatically increase resistance in the placental microcirculation and may be involved in blood flow redistribution with hypoxia. At birth, the increase in oxygen tension is important in triggering ductus vasoconstriction. It is proposed that oxygen triggers closure of the ductus arteriosus by activating a specific, cytochrome P450-linked reaction, which in turn stimulates the synthesis of ET-1. On the neonatal heart, ET-1 has a positive chronotropic but negative inotropic effect. In the newborn piglet and the fetal lamb, both term and preterm, ET-1 causes a potent, long-lasting pulmonary vasoconstriction. Furthermore, a transient dilator response has been identified, and it is ascribed to nitric oxide formation. ET receptors are abundant in the piglet pulmonary vasculature. They are predominantly of the ETA constrictor subtype, though ETB2 constrictor receptors may also be present in certain species. The dilator response is linked to the ETB1 receptor, and the number of ETB1 receptors is reduced in hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension. ET-1 appears to be a causative agent in the pathogenesis of hypoxia- and hyperoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension as demonstrated by reversal of hemodynamic and morphological changes with treatment with an ETA receptor antagonist. Findings are amenable to practical applications in the management of infants with pulmonary hypertension or requiring persistent patency of the ductus arteriosus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".