MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163781806 · doi:10.2113/gscanmin.39.2.557

PARENTAL MAGMA AND EMPLACEMENT OF THE STRATIFORM UITKOMST COMPLEX, SOUTH AFRICA

2001· article· en· W2163781806 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
S. A. de Waal, Wolfgang D. Maier, Richard Armstrong, Christoph Gauert

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of PretoriaNational Research Foundation
KeywordsGeologyMagmaGeochemistryZirconMagma chamberIntrusionPetrologyVolcano

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Uitkomst Complex, a Ni–Cu–PGE–Cr-mineralized layered basic intrusion situated approximately 200 km due east of Pretoria, South Africa, hosts commercially viable magmatic base-metal sulfide deposits. The Complex has a concordant 207Pb/206Pb zircon age of 2044 ± 8 Ma, suggesting that it is coeval with the Rustenburg Layered Suite (RLS) of the Bushveld Complex. Chemical modeling, using summation and least-squares optimization techniques, provides evidence that the boninitic Bushveld B1 magma is parental to both the lower ultrabasic and upper basic layered series of the Uitkomst Complex. The layered series crystallized in two stages, i.e., a lower conduit and an upper closed-system stage. The tubular shape of the Uitkomst Complex is the result of the intersection of a near-horizontal bedding plane fault with an existing vertical fracture zone under tensional conditions. During the conduit stage, a combination of magma mixing, contamination and flow dynamics may have facilitated sulfide formation and segregation. The identification of Bushveld B1 magma as the major parental magma of the Uitkomst Complex has significance in the exploration for similarly mineralized sub-RLS intrusive bodies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.524
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207