MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163792322 · doi:10.1177/1074840704267388

The Unspeakable Nature of Pediatric Palliative Care: Unveiling Many Cloaks

2004· article· en· W2163792322 on OpenAlexaff
Lillian Rallison, Nancy J. Moules

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Family Nursing · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPalliative carePsychologyNursingSociologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, the authors address the topic of pediatric palliative care and the unspeakable nature of the very practice of caring for children that are dying. This unspeakableness shows up in many ways around a silencing of the practice itself, a silencing of the topic of death within in the practice, and ultimately, a silencing of children and families who are faced with one of the most profound life events of loss imaginable. The authors speak to this unspeakable nature and offer family systems nursing practices and the illness beliefs model as one way to give language and voice to the suffering and strengths that inhabit this often-wordless terrain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.483
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Family NursingSame topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207