Bibliographic record
Abstract
The impact of redevelopment and expansion of airport operations has not received much attention in the literature. Data were collected for 22 North American airports, 26 airport projects, and 107 individual operational years (airport years) with at least 3.5 million passengers annually. Each airport undertook at least one brownfield passenger terminal project between 1991 and 2001. The study shows that some factors, such as traffic volume, air traffic movements, and cargo, may indicate impacts of airport redevelopment. It was also found that the strategic use of space is critical to operational efficiency, especially with the full range of non-aeronautical services that can be offered at airports. The cost of space may be higher, but it tended to improve overall efficiency. Reconstruction projects that were evaluated as successful tended to show operational recovery within 2 years of construction completion; this result was consistent through a wide range of project sizes, traffic levels, and services.Key words: airport terminal reconstruction, benchmarking, reconstruction impacts, airport performance measures, data envelopment analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".