Adaptive neuro-fuzzy controllers for an open-loop morphing wing system
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A new method for the realization of two neuro-fuzzy controllers for a morphing wing design application is presented here. The controllers' main function is to correlate each set of pressure differences, calculated between the optimized and the reference airfoil, with each of the airfoil deformations produced by the actuators' system. The pressures are calculated at different chord positions and will also be measured during wind tunnel tests. During a first identification phase, the two fuzzy inference systems (FISs) from the controllers' structure are generated for 16 flight conditions characterized by Mach numbers and angles of attack. Next, the FIS are optimized with the Matlab function adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) by training over different epochs. Finally, the controllers are validated for the other 33 flight conditions of the open-loop morphing wing system. This is the first time that such a method of relating the pressure differences to airfoil displacements has been conceived and used in an open-loop morphing wing controller system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it