MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

O papel protetor da mentalização de experiências traumáticas: implicações quando da entrada na parentalidade

2015· article· pt· W2163853767 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEstilos da Clinica · 2015
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychology and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsPsychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Já é amplamente reconhecido que as experiências de abuso e de trauma na infância, particularmente as que se passam em um contexto de apego sem segurança, prejudicam o desenvolvimento do sentimento fundamental de segurança em relação ao outro, deixando, desse modo, as vítimas com um sentimento de solidão e com afetos e dores que não podem ser partilhados e associados ao trauma. Por sua vez, quando essas crianças crescem e tornam-se pais, permanecem extremamente vulneráveis à desorganização e à confusão quando confrontados ao desamparo de seus filhos. Isso os torna ainda mais passíveis de reagir de modo impróprio, considerando a ativação dos efeitos ligados ao trauma não resolvido. Entretanto, tal como demonstrado por Fraiberg, os pais aptos para fazer face às experiências traumáticas e aos chamados "fantasmas do passado" têm menor risco de transmitir o trauma a seus filhos. Isso sugere que a mentalização é um fator importante de resiliência.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.124
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.295
GPT teacher head0.492
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it