MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163897687 · doi:10.1109/tmech.2011.2119323

Radially Biased Axial Magnetic Bearings/Motors for Precision Rotary-Axial Spindles

2011· article· en· W2163897687 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Machining and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThrustActuatorMagnetic bearingStiffnessFluid bearingMachine toolBearing (navigation)Power (physics)VibrationMechanical engineeringAcousticsPhysicsEngineeringMagnetLubricationStructural engineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unlike traditional position holding thrust magnetic bearings, electromagnetic actuators can be advantageously used as both an axial bearing and an in-feed motor in precision machine tools that require only millimeter axial stroke. This paper presents the working principle, design, and analysis of radially biased electromagnetic actuators for precision rotary-axial spindle applications. The analysis results indicate that the radially biased actuator design can offer eight times higher load capacity and 16 times higher force-to-power ratio than conventional horseshoe-type thrust bearings. Experimental results from the constructed rotary-axial spindle prototype demonstrate 5000-N load capacity, 340-N/μm dynamic stiffness, and 1.5-mm axial stroke with 10-nm motion resolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.755
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it