MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163901830 · doi:10.1109/acc.2011.5990882

Optimal control of a third order nonlinear system based on an inverse optimality method

2011· article· en· W2163901830 on OpenAlexaff
Mehdi Abedinpour Fallah, Luís Rodrigues

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptimal controlControl theory (sociology)Bellman equationLyapunov functionControl-Lyapunov functionNonlinear systemInverseController (irrigation)MathematicsMathematical optimizationMobile robotFunction (biology)Hamilton–Jacobi equationHamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equationPath (computing)Computer scienceControl (management)Lyapunov redesignRobotApplied mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a nonlinear optimal control problem for a third order system is defined and solved. The optimal control law is found using an inverse optimality approach to solve the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation, where the solution is obtained directly for the control input without needing to assume or compute a value function first. However, the value function can be obtained after one solves for the control input and it is shown to be at least a local Lyapunov function. The developed controller is applied to a path following control of a wheeled mobile robot.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.649
Threshold uncertainty score0.661

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicControl and Dynamics of Mobile RobotsFrench-language works237,207