MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163904561 · doi:10.1071/aseg2015ab104

Airborne Inductive Induced Polarization Chargeability Mapping of VTEM Data

2015· article· en· W2163904561 on OpenAlexaffabout
Karl Kwan, Alexander Prikhodko, Jean M. Legault, Geoffrey Plastow, Joe Xie, Keith Fisk

Bibliographic record

VenueASEG Extended Abstracts · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsPetro Geotech (Canada)
FundersCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
KeywordsInduced polarizationTime domainElectrical resistivity and conductivityGeologyPolarization (electrochemistry)Frequency domainData setMineralogyRemote sensingGeophysicsElectrical engineeringMathematicsComputer scienceEngineeringChemistryStatisticsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Airborne inductive induced polarization (AIIP) effect has been widely recognized in airborne time domain EM system data. AIIP chargeability mapping opens new and exciting areas in mineral exploration for airborne time domain EM systems in the search for sulphides and clay minerals. An AIIP chargeability mapping tool based on CSIRO/AMIRA Airbeo is created for VTEM data, with examples from Mt Milligan, British Columbia, Canada and Tullah, Tasmania. Using the Cole-Cole frequency dependent resistivity, the tool examines the VTEM decay data spectrally and selects the decay associated with the lowest RMS error from a set of decays generated by varying chargeability m and time constant T within specific ranges, giving a constant frequency factor c, while the background resistivity is inverted. The parameter mo used to generate the decay is the AIIP apparent chargeability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASEG Extended AbstractsSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207