MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163968628 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2003.1226115

Video sequence processing based on spatiotemporal independent component analysis

2004· article· en· W2163968628 on OpenAlexaff
Zhenhe Chen, Xiao–Ping Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer visionWaveletVideo compression picture typesData compressionVideo trackingIndependent component analysisFrame (networking)Pattern recognition (psychology)Multiview Video CodingVideo processingWavelet transformFeature extractionEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionObject (grammar)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Compression and content-based video retrieval (CBVR) are essential needs for efficient and intelligent utilizations of vast multimedia databases over the Internet. In video sequences, object based extraction techniques are gaining importance in achieving compression and performing content-based video retrieval. In this paper, we propose a novel technique to extract objects from video sequences based on spatiotemporal independent component analysis (stICA), -wavelet analysis and edge detection. The frame data obtained after stICA analysis is further processed using wavelet, and edge detection techniques to improve the accuracy of the extracted object. Initial studies demonstrate high potential for stICA based object extraction technique in comparison with existing techniques. Nine frames captured from a video sequence are used in our experiments and high extraction accuracy was achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score0.464

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207