MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163981227 · doi:10.2113/gsrocky.42.2.67

Redescription of the Late Cretaceous (late Santonian) ammonite Desmoscaphites bassleri Reeside, 1927, from the Western Interior of North America

2007· article· en· W2163981227 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
N. H. Landman, W. A. Cobban

Bibliographic record

VenueRocky Mountain geology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Geological Survey
KeywordsAmmoniteGeologyCretaceousPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Late Cretaceous scaphitid ammonite Desmoscaphites bassleri Reeside, 1927, is redescribed based on newly collected material from Montana. This species is an important index fossil and demarcates the uppermost Santonian in the U.S. Western Interior. It is widely distributed and extends from Alberta to New Mexico, primarily along the western margin of the Interior Seaway. The adult shell is moderately stout and closely coiled, with small ventrolateral tubercles on the body chamber. Microconchs are smaller than macroconchs but otherwise similar in morphology. There is an abrupt change in ornamentation on the late juvenile whorls from coarse, widely spaced ribs to threadlike, more closely spaced ribs, with a pronounced sinuosity. The ribs later become more widely spaced on the shaft of the body chamber and more closely spaced again near the aperture. The early whorls are characterized by constrictions, which represent flexures in the shell wall. The constrictions first appear at a shell diameter of approximately 3 mm and occur regularly thereafter at intervals of 65–90° up to a shell diameter of approximately 15 mm. The suture is characterized by a trifid first lateral lobe. This lobe does not pass through an asymmetrically bifid stage during ontogenetic development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRocky Mountain geologySame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207