MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164013489 · doi:10.1592/phco.29.7.784

Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin Type A for the Prophylaxis of Episodic Migraine Headaches: A Meta‐analysis of Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Trials

2009· review· en· W2164013489 on OpenAlexaff
Adam J. Shuhendler, So-Young Lee, Ms. Michelle Siu, Ms. Stephanie Ondovcik, MSc Philip W Lam, Ms. Awatif Alabdullatif, M. Zhang, Márcio Machado, Thomas R. Einarson

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMigraine and Headache Studies
Canadian institutionsToronto Public HealthUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMigrainePlaceboHeadachesBotulinum toxinMedicineRandomized controlled trialAnesthesiaMeta-analysisInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of botulinum toxin type A in lowering the frequency of migraine headaches in patients with episodic migraines. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of eight randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. PATIENTS: A total of 1601 patients with a history of episodic migraine headaches classified as those experiencing headaches fewer than 15 times/month over a 3-month period. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to October 2007 in order to locate randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials that compared the efficacy of pericranial botulinum toxin A injections with placebo in the prevention of migraines in patients with a history of episodic migraine headaches. The primary outcome of interest was change from baseline to end point in migraine frequency (number of migraines/month). A random effects model was used to combine study results, and the standardized mean difference (Cohen's d) in migraine frequency between the placebo and botulinum toxin A groups was reported. Effect sizes (d) less than 0.2 were considered small. Quality assessment was performed by using the Downs and Black scale. Eight randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials (1601 patients) presented a quantitative assessment of the efficacy of botulinum toxin A versus placebo. The overall treatment effect size of botulinum toxin A over placebo for 30, 60, and 90 days after injection was d -0.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.14-0.03, z=1.33, p=0.18), d -0.05 (95% CI -0.14-0.03, z=1.22, p=0.22), and d -0.05 (95% CI -0.13-0.04, z=1.07, p=0.28), respectively. Even after controlling for a high placebo effect, and after dose stratification, no significant effect of botulinum toxin A in reducing migraine frequency/month was seen over placebo. CONCLUSION: Botulinum toxin A for the prophylactic treatment of episodic migraine headaches was not significantly different from placebo, both from a clinical and statistical perspective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.024
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (broad)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0240.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0250.014
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.209
GPT teacher head0.478
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug TherapySame topicMigraine and Headache StudiesFrench-language works237,207