Will Kymlicka. Multicultural Odysseys: Navigating the New International Politics of Diversity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Will Kymlicka. Multicultural Odysseys: Navigating the New International Politics of Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. 374 pp. Bibliography. Index. $39.95 hc. Canada is a pioneer in multicultural policy, and Canadian political philosopher Will Kymlicka is an internationally recognized authority on multiculturalism. The range, research, and relevance of this intellectually rigorous and textured book are impressive. Kymlicka examines the origins and forms of multiculturalism, the diffusion of the idea by international organizations, and the experiences of Western, post-communist, and post-colonial states. multiculturalists believe that the recognition and accommodation of ethnic diversity contributes to expanding human rights and freedoms, to strengthening democratic institutions, and to diminishing ethnic hierarchies. Kymlicka draws on Canadian practices, and Canadianists will be familiar with them, but Canada is but one state sampled in his global compass, and thus there are comparative lessons to be drawn. The book will be of interest to students of international institutions and political theory and to comparativists focussed on ethnocultural questions. A self-professed liberal foot soldier (7) and fellow traveller (15) of the global policy networks engaged in liberal multicultural discourse, Kymlicka is hopeful, but somewhat uncertain, frustrated, and pessimistic about how to contribute to advancing and internationalizing his position. He points, for example, to some perverse results of the liberal multicultural policies pursued by some organizations, and he is sceptical about their efforts. The liberal multicultural project must, nevertheless, be risked, he believes, however modest the effort and however challenging the conundrums it poses in different societal contexts. Kymlicka's analysis is sophisticated and sobering, nuanced if not neutral. Kymlicka uses as an umbrella term to refer to policies related to non-dominant ethnocultural groups, but the term itself, as he acknowledges, is problematic. Most commonly deployed in the West, both governmental and nongovernmental international organizations generally shun it and often prefer cultural diversity, minorities, pluriculturalism, and interculturalism. In some states, as in Britain where is the preferred term, it refers only to newer immigrant groups and not, for example, the Welsh. As in his Canadian work, Kymlicka uses to include national minorities (e.g., French Canadians) and indigenous peoples (e.g., the Metis and what are now termed First Nations), as well as immigrant groups. Liberal multiculturalism implies that multicultural policies, intended to advance and preserve vulnerable minority groups, will be consistent with the foundational principles of individual freedom, equality, and a democratic polity. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.038 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".