MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164045278 · doi:10.3968/7657

The Comprehension of Humor in Indirect Speech Acts with Frame-shifting Theory

2015· article· en· W2164045278 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiangnan Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLanguage, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelational frame theoryFrame (networking)Competence (human resources)LinguisticsComprehensionMeaning (existential)Computer scienceFocus (optics)Human lifeProcess (computing)PsychologyEpistemologyPhilosophySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Being a common type of language behavior in human being’s society, humour plays an essential role in human life, especially in communication. If the hearer is lacking in linguistic competence, the transmission of information will be hindered, and the speaker’s meaning will be misinterpreted or twisted. Most of the humours are generated or produced by unsmooth information exchanged from the speaker, which is intentional or unintentional. Humour generation process is the process of proposing and creating a framework consciously, and then activating the elements associated with another framework and confirming the identified information through transferring to another frame. So that Frame-shifting Theory is very necessary when comprehending the process of humour generation. The writer lists some humours examples existing in Indirect Speech Acts in the paper, which focus on how the hearer comprehends the humour with the Frame-shifting Theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicLanguage, Discourse, Communication StrategiesFrench-language works237,207