Rapid Dynamic Image Registration of the Beating Heart for Diagnosis and Surgical Navigation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dynamic cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MR) and computed tomography (CT) provide cardiologists and cardiac surgeons with high-quality 4-D images for diagnosis and therapy, yet the effective use of these high-quality anatomical models remains a challenge. Ultrasound (US) is a flexible imaging tool, but the US images produced are often difficult to interpret unless they are placed within their proper 3-D anatomical context. The ability to correlate real-time 3-D US volumes (RT3D US) with dynamic MR/CT images would offer a significant contribution to improve the quality of cardiac procedures. In this paper, we present a rapid two-step method for registering RT3D US to high-quality dynamic 3-D MR/CT images of the beating heart. This technique overcomes some major limitations of image registration (such as the correct registration result not necessarily occurring at the maximum of the mutual information (MI) metric) using the MI metric. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in a dynamic heart phantom (DHP) study and a human subject study. The achieved mean target registration error of CT+US images in the phantom study is 2.59 mm. Validation using human MR/US volumes shows a target registration error of 1.76 mm. We anticipate that this technique will substantially improve the quality of cardiac diagnosis and therapies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".