MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164112854 · doi:10.1109/68.853494

Improving the ability of a distributed feedback laser transfer-matrix model to fit to spectra from distributed-feedback lasers

2000· article· en· W2164112854 on OpenAlexaff
Gordon Morrison, Daniel T. Cassidy

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Photonics Technology Letters · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBandwidth (computing)Computer scienceLaserSemiconductor laser theoryDistributed feedback laserSpectral lineProcess (computing)Facet (psychology)OpticsPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fitting distributed-feedback (DFB) laser models to data is a difficult process that is time consuming and often inaccurate. Having a good initial estimate of the facet parameters greatly reduces the time required by a fitting routine. If the general effects of laser parameters are well known, fitting routines do not have to be overly complicated to obtain a best fit. It is also very important to fit to spectra from both facets simultaneously and over a wide bandwidth for quick, accurate, and nondegenerate results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Photonics Technology LettersSame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207