MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164143514 · doi:10.1353/crc.2015.0023

Modernism Today ed. by Sjef Houppermans etal. (review)

2015· article· en· W2164143514 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Verita Sriratana

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian review of comparative literature · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLiterature, Politics, and Exile Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModernism (music)ModernitySkepticismJazzAestheticsArt historyHistorySociologyArtPolitical sciencePhilosophyLawEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Modernism Today ed. by Sjef Houppermans etal. Verita Sriratana Houppermans, Sjef, Peter Liebregts, Jam Baetens, and Otto Boele, eds. Modernism Today. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi, 2013. Pp. 283. Modernism Today is not only a scholarly attempt to revise, as well as expand, the many shifting definitions of Modernism, but also a strong testimony to the transnational quality inherent within Modernism as an aesthetic and intellectual movement that thrives on the cross-fertilisation of ideas in different spatial, temporal and cultural contexts. In “What Modernism Was and Is: By Way of an Introduction”, Sascha Bru and Dirk de Geest offer a succinct overview of the past, present and even prospective trends in Modernist studies, charting and re-charting the critical and physical terrains which tend to be overlooked by scholars of Modernism. Central Europe’s shifting national borders and multicultural interrelationships form cases in point: “the rediscovery of that Other Europe, that is Central Europe, is slowly beginning to manifest the importance of notions like ‘transnational’ precisely by pointing at the capital importance of national differences and the cultural exchanges between them” (6). Jacqueline Bel, in “Intellectual Scepticism versus Avant-Garde Bragging: Modernism in Dutch Literature”, leads readers into the mellow jazz-resounding world of Dutch Modernism, in which the notion of “Modernism” has been interrogated and, at times, dismissed as obsolete as it fails to capture (if the use of this verb is possible at all) the sense of the just-now “newness” of modernity. The author of this review was also fascinated to learn that avant-gardism, in the case of the Netherlands, where the term was introduced only in 1984, is truly “a literary-historical construction” (77). The collection’s revisionary project, as outlined in the introductory section, puts on centre stage the concept of the “arrière-garde”: “Arrière-garde artists are not merely representatives of a conservative ideology or aesthetic, they deliberately attempt to renew literature, yet not by destroying its rhetorical foundations but rather by trying to re-interpret older and widely shared components from the literary tradition” (8). What the author of this review finds to be Modernism Today’s important contribution is the discussion of the ways in which the arrière-garde writers and artists venture to question even the tenets of the increasingly canonised avant-garde movement. Graham Greene, as Peter Liebregts points out, is an example of a sceptical arrièregarde daring to criticise what the reading public of his time—and even to this day—perceived to be avant-garde writings: literary works by T.S. Eliot, James Joyce, Ezra Pound and Virginia Woolf. A discussion of Greene’s 1945 essay “François Mauriac”, in which he audaciously comments upon Virginia Woolf’s Mrs Dalloway (1925), a novel considered by readers and critics to be the quintessence of Modernism, confirms that the label “Modernism” as we know it today is a posthumous designation of the living, changing and contradictory literary landscape of his time: [End Page 325] Mrs Dalloway walking down Regent Street was aware of the glitter of shop windows, the smooth passage of cars, the conversation of shoppers, but it was only a Regent Street seen by Mrs Dalloway that was conveyed to the reader: a charming whimsical rather sentimental prose poem was what Regent Street had become: a current of air, a touch of scent, a sparkle of glass. But, we protest, Regent Street too has a right to exist; it is more real than Mrs Dalloway. (37) It is made apparent in this volume that the writers whom readers often regard as prototypically Modernist par excellence form only one of the many artistic waves in the twentieth-century literary ocean. Peter de Voogd’s essay tells the gripping story of the makings of James Joyce in his study of Joyce and the small magazines, particularly a magazine called transition, which earned the nickname la maison de Joyce [the home of Joyce] from the French critic Marcel Brion for publishing the later Finnegans Wake: “English literary Modernism manifested itself mostly through a large number of small and struggling magazines and journals which were part of...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian review of comparative literatureSame topicLiterature, Politics, and Exile StudiesFrench-language works237,207