MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164180689 · doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00264.2002

Modulation of smooth muscle phenotype in vitro by homologous cell substrate

2003· article· en· W2164180689 on OpenAlexaff
Sabeen Chaudry, Barbara Tolloczko, James G. Martin, Suzanne Kelly

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityChristie (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIn vitroCellCell biologyActinMyocyteIntracellularCell culturePhenotypeChemistryBiologyBiophysicsBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have developed a novel cell culture system that supports the shortening of smooth muscle cells. Primary rat airway smooth muscle cells were plated on an ethanol-fixed, confluent monolayer of homologous smooth muscle cells (homologous cell substrate, HCS). Cells grown on HCS exhibited morphological and functional characteristics consistent with a differentiated phenotype. Cells on HCS were spindle shaped with a well-defined long axis, whereas cells grown on glass were larger and irregularly shaped. Smooth muscle-specific alpha-actin immunostained diffusely in cells on HCS, whereas it appeared as stress fibers in cells on glass. Agonists recruited a greater fraction of HCS cells to contract, resulting in greater changes in cell area or length on average, but the maximal capacity of shortening of individual cells was similar between the groups. Unlike cells on glass, cells on HCS shortened to methacholine. HCS was reversible and persisted over several passages. Agonists stimulated intracellular Ca(2+) oscillations in cells on HCS, whereas they elicited biphasic peak and plateau transients in cells on glass. HCS modulates smooth muscle cell phenotype in vitro.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Cell PhysiologySame topicCell Adhesion Molecules ResearchFrench-language works237,207