MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164186047 · doi:10.1109/glocom.1997.644567

Performance of a knockout switch for multimedia satellite communications

2002· article· en· W2164186047 on OpenAlexaff
Tho Le‐Ngoc, Tien Hy Bui, M. Hachicha

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBurstinessComputer scienceTelecommunications linkComputer networkStatistical time division multiplexingReal-time computingJitterDedicated short-range communicationsNetwork packetMarkov processQueueing theoryMultiplexingTelecommunicationsWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the performance of a multiple-beam satellite communications system using an on-board knockout switch to support multimedia services. Aggregate voice or video traffic is modeled as a 2-state Markov modulated Poisson process (MMPP) while two models for aggregate data traffic, MMPP and Pareto-modulated Poisson process (PMPP), are used to examine the effects of traffic burstiness and long-range dependent behavior. Multiple-frequency time division multiple access (MF-TDMA) is used on the uplink in conjunction with a dynamic capacity allocation scheme. Higher priority is given to voice, and video realtime traffic to avoid delay variation. An on-board downlink queue for jitter-tolerant data is provided to achieve high statistical multiplexing gain. Simulation results show that packet loss due to the knockout contention scheme is much lower than that due to the limited capacity on the uplink and downlink. This makes the knockout architecture attractive for on-board switching to achieve low complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207