Du but initial au but subjectif : la réponse des appelés dans les textes de la Première Alliance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On a souvent commenté les récits de vocation des textes de la Première Alliance. Jamais cependant ne les a-t-on lus à partir d'une grille de théologie du procès (process theology). C'est donc à la lumière de cette approche qu'ils sont ici analysés en privilégiant quelques concepts du procès tels les buts initiaux, les buts subjectifs et l'avancée créatrice. Délaissant le côté psychologique ou historique des narrations, c'est aux attraits de base inscrits par les auteurs de ces textes que cette étude s'intéresse. Il en ressort un appel à quitter les sécurités des modes de pensée et d'agir passés pour inventer, dans la continuité et la rupture, de nouvelles avenues où les relations à soi, aux autres et à Dieu se jouent sous le mode de l'inter-action et du devenir mutuel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".