MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164224373 · doi:10.1016/s0008-6363(01)00448-5

Is angiotensin II a proliferative factor of cardiac fibroblasts?

2002· review· en· W2164224373 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiovascular Research · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeptidase Inhibition and Analysis
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversité de Montréal
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsAngiotensin IIExtracellular matrixGrowth factorEndocrinologyInternal medicineRenin–angiotensin systemBiologyAngiotensin receptorMyocyteCell biologyChemistryMedicineReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Angiotensin II has been implicated as an important factor in cardiac remodeling, particularly in the development of pathological left ventricular hypertrophy. It is generally assumed that angiotensin II is able to alter the phenotype of cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts, and several experiments have suggested that this peptide can particularly affect the proliferation of cardiac fibroblasts. However, a review of the published results indicates that there is no evidence that angiotensin II can directly trigger mitogenesis through activation of the cyclin-dependent pathway. The observed proliferative effect might well be caused by stimulation of the synthesis of growth or inflammatory substances like platelet-derived growth factor and cytokines, by integrin activation due to secreted extracellular matrix proteins, or by a combination of these mechanisms. Angiotensin II thus appears to differentiate cardiac fibroblasts into a growth substance-secreting phenotype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.012
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.223
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it