MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164329801 · doi:10.2113/gsecongeo.101.4.791

Hydrothermal Alteration and Mineralization in the Neves-Corvo Volcanic-Hosted Massive Sulfide Deposit, Portugal. II. Oxygen, Hydrogen, and Carbon Isotopes

2006· article· en· W2164329801 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jorge M. R. S. Relvas, Fernando Barriga, Fred J. Longstaffe

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomic Geology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMineralization (soil science)Hydrothermal circulationGeochemistrySulfideVolcanoGeologyIsotopes of oxygenHydrogen sulfideOxygenMineralogyChemistrySulfurPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The oxygen, hydrogen, and carbon isotope compositions of hydrothermally altered rocks and minerals from massive and stockwork ores of the Neves-Corvo volcanic-hosted massive sulfide deposit have been used to infer its thermal history and the origins of the hydrothermal fluids. Quartz and cassiterite separated from the stringer and massive cassiterite ores of the Corvo orebody (“tin corridor”) have δ18O values of 12.5 to 13.6 and −1.4 to −0.4 per mil, respectively. Quartz-cassiterite oxygen isotope fractionation indicates temperatures of 174° to 207°C (avg 191°C) for precipitation of this mineral pair. The calculated oxygen isotope composition of the fluid (δ18OH2O = −0.4 to +0.7‰; avg 0.1‰) suggests that cassiterite precipitation resulted from extensive mixing of a tin-bearing fluid with seawater at sea-floor hydrothermal vents. The whole-rock oxygen isotope composition of the hydrothermally altered, felsic volcanic rocks hosting the sulfide stockwork of the Corvo orebody varies from the central stockwork (chloritic alteration zone I, δ18O = 8.7–9.6‰), to the peripheral zones (sericitic and paragonitic alteration zones IIa, δ18O = 11.6–13.1‰, and IIb, δ18O = 11.0–14.1‰). The δ18O values of quartz also increase from alteration zone I (avg 13.9‰) to alteration zone IIa (avg 14.4‰) to alteration zone IIb (avg 15.0‰). Quartz from the hanging-wall jasper unit yielded higher δ18O values of 15.5 to 17.9 per mil. Chlorite from alteration zone I has δ18O values of 6.1 to 8.4 per mil (avg 7.4‰). Sericite has δ18O and δD values that vary slightly from δ18O = 9.3 to 10.1 per mil (avg 9.9‰) and δD = −59 to −47 per mil (avg −53‰) in alteration zone I, to δ18O = 9.8 to 11.4 per mil (avg 10.5‰) and δD = −50 per mil in alteration zone IIa, to δ18O = 9.4 to 11.7 per mil (avg 10.6‰) and δD = −61 to −36 per mil (avg −45‰) in alteration zone IIb. Siderite associated with waning hydrothermal activity has low δ13C values (−11.1 to −5.8‰), suggesting the incorporation of oxidized, organic carbon from the footwall sequence and/or the addition of magmatic carbon. In alteration zone I, quartz-chlorite fractionation indicates temperatures of 249° to 402°C (avg 335°C) and δ18OH2O values of 6.1 to 10.2 per mil (avg 8.3‰). Quartz-sericite pairs gave isotopic equilibrium temperatures of 250° to 289°C (avg 269°C) and δ18OH2O values of 5.8 to 7.0 per mil (avg 6.4‰) in alteration zone IIa, and 170° to 318°C (avg 223°C) and δ18OH2O = 1.4 to 8.3 per mil (avg 4.5‰) in alteration zone IIb. The oxygen isotope data show that in the core of the feeder system (alteration zone I), the temperature and the δ18OH2O values were very high. The δD values calculated for the ore fluids (δD = −37 to −11‰) are also significantly lower than seawater. Outward from the central stockwork (alteration zones IIa and IIb) the ore fluid was depleted in 18O and the temperatures were lower. The oxygen, hydrogen, and carbon isotope signatures of the Neves-Corvo ore fluids are best explained by incorporation of magmatic and/or metamorphic fluids into a seawater-dominated hydrothermal system. Magmatic fluids, in particular, were a likely source for the tin and much of the copper in the Neves-Corvo ores.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.937

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEconomic GeologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207