MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164330593 · doi:10.3168/jds.2013-7381

Relationship between postmilking standing duration and risk of intramammary infection in freestall-housed dairy cows milked 3 times per day

2014· article· en· W2164330593 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Mary Ellen Alexandrea Watters, Herman W. Barkema, K.E. Leslie, M.A.G. von Keyserlingk, T.J. DeVries

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Guelph
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaCanadian Dairy CommissionDairy Farmers of CanadaUniversity of Guelph
KeywordsMilkingHerdMastitisAnimal scienceSomatic cell countVeterinary medicineDairy cattleBulk tankBiologyIncidence (geometry)MedicineLactationIce calvingPregnancyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent evidence exists to suggest that the risk of subclinical mastitis, particularly those infections caused by environmental pathogens, in dairy cows is related to standing and lying patterns. The objective of this study was to determine the association between postmilking standing duration (PMSD) of dairy cows milked 3×/d and risk of intramammary infection (IMI). Four commercial freestall dairy herds in Eastern Ontario, milking 3×/d, were enrolled in a longitudinal study. Forty Holstein-Friesian cows per herd were randomly selected as focal animals from those cows in each herd that met our selection criteria of days in milk (<200 d) and somatic cell count (<100,000 cells/mL). The study consisted of three 28-d periods. The study began following a regularly scheduled Dairy Herd Improvement test with the collection of quarter-level milk samples from all focal animals. Bacteriology was used to confirm infection status at the start of the study and for determination of incidence of IMI throughout the study. A new IMI was defined as having a culture-positive quarter-level sample when the previous sample (28 d prior) had been culture negative for the pathogen of interest. Four sets of quarter-level milk samples were obtained for each focal animal. Lying behavior was recorded for 5 d after each milk sampling using data loggers. For these 5 d, individual milking times, production, and feeding times were also recorded. Postmilking standing duration was analyzed by milking event, with increased PMSD being positively associated with provision of fresh feed or freshly pushed-up feed around the time of milking, greater feed bunk space per cow, and lower freestall stocking density. Over the study period, 456 new IMI were detected, resulting in a mean herd incidence rate of 3.22 IMI per quarter year. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) and Corynebacterium spp. IMI were statistically analyzed to determine relationship with PMSD; they were the 2 predominant pathogens representing 45 and 31% of IMI, respectively. Only CNS IMI was associated with PMSD. A nonlinear relationship between PMSD and incidence of CNS IMI was found; cows with a PMSD of 90 to 120 min were at a reduced risk for CNS IMI. The risk of experiencing CNS IMI was also reduced with increased frequency of feed push-ups and provision of fresh feed 60 min before to 90 min after milking and >540 min after milking. These results indicate that management practices that promote PMSD of 90 to 120 min, such as the provision of fresh feed or freshly pushed-up feed around the time of milking, providing ample feed bunk space per cow, and keeping freestall stocking density low, should be encouraged to reduce the risk of CNS IMI in freestall-housed cows milked 3×/d.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy CowsFrench-language works237,207